Re: routing decision based on sorce port

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 09:16:30 -0600 "Greg Scott" <GregScott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What's wrong with using iptables to mark the packets?  That is what it's
> for...

Well, I thought it would be "cleaner" to use the routing tools to do the
routing. If that's the "way to do it", fine.

thanks,
_sh_


> - Greg Scott
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lartc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:lartc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sebastian Heidl
> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 8:31 AM
> To: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:  routing decision based on sorce port
> 
> 
> 
> Hello Routing Gurus ;-)
> 
> I'd like to know if it's possible to make a routing decision for pakets
> originating from a specific port of the local machine without using
> ipfilter/iptables to mark the pakets. I read about the tc filter stuff
> but that seems only to be able to sort the pakets to a different queue
> on the same interface and not choose a different interface for example.
> 
> Is that at all possible and if yes how ?
> 
> regards,
> _sh_
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list
> LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux