I'll take it from the begining... About one year ago I only had 1 IP and used wondershaper. It worked great. Now I got /27 (32 IPs) and a gw computer that talks to two ISPs via a two tunnels. See: http://www.flashdance.cx/pics/flashdance-LAN.png I _really_ have a need to do QoS on my connection, for example I host websites that uses all available upstream. When I download at the same time it cant respond to ACK's fast enough so get very slow download speed. Its also ADSL that I got so I got nice long buffers at my ISPs DSLAMs that shouldnt be filled. I have tried to figure out how to write QoS rules that did what I wanted, it didnt work very well. My gw have over 100 TCP connections every given moment and there is bunch of people that will be affected (not counting web/ftp/mail/dns requests) if it goes down or misbehaves. So I dont have any desire to play with QoS to much on the gw box. I have tried to search for a QoS script that I could modify and use but more or less ALL scripts expects that you are using NAT (which Im not, I hate NAT. Guess why I got 32 real IPs) or just got one computer. All scripts that I have found does QoS based on port, not IP. I use different IPs for different services, so I wanna do QoS based on IP, not the port. What I need is a script that sets a high priority on ACK's, all UDP traffic by default. Then I want to have different priority on diffrent IPs, all IPs should have a max available and a min available bandwidth that they could use, in case all upstream bandwidth are used (thats the normal condition). And, that works when there is a computer that are a gateway that just forwards all traffic from one interface to an other. Basicly, Im asking if someone got a such script for me that I could use as a base and just add which IPs that should have so or so max and min bandwidth? I cant be the only one on earth that would be needing a such thing. This is the first question. The second question is, which interface should I do QoS on? My gw computer (are using FC3, Linux 2.6): eth0 = my LAN eth1 = ISP1 eth2 = ISP2 tun0 = tunnel that goes over ISP1 tun1 = tunnel that goes over ISP2 teql0 = the upstream of ISP1 and ISP2 added together, later splits into tun0 and tun1 computer at my LAN -> eth0 -> teql0 -> tun0 -> eth1 (one example of how a packet would go...) Question is: Should I do QoS at eth0? At eth0 and teql0? Just teql0? Help is highly appreciated. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
