On Sunday 04 December 2005 17:36, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > Even if they end up in 2:3, they should at least be treated fairly. 2:3 will not be treated at all as long as 2:1 and 2:2 (which have higher priority) are occupied. If the queues in 2:1 and 2:2 resp. never empty, the packets in 2:3 will never be sent. There is no fair treatment in PRIO. That's the whole purpose of this scheduler, to give one band of packets absolute priority over the other. > What have I done wrong? This is just out of personal interest, but could you try using instead of your TBF qdisc, a very simple HTB Qdisc / class with the same bandwidth limitation? If that solves the problem, then you're suffering from a problem that I failed to solve when I last tried to use TBF; for some reason it got stuck on me too. > So maybe for some reason that last ack is not being dequeued? I don't understand what you mean by fair treatment, but do try putting all ACKs into high priority band, then it will have to be dequeued. Regards, Andreas Klauer _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
