On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:31:31 -0400 jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 16:16 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > Look like the -batch code that keeps the RTNL handle open was > > breaking this. The patch shows the general idea, but it still has > > problems because I think it would still not work if used in > > -batch situation. > > I see what you mean. > You definitely need at least one extra socket for deleting > in the flush_rule(). Something like the attached, untested, > uncompiled. > > > Krzysztof, if you have time please try the attached patch? > > cheers, > jamal applied to iproute2 cvs -- Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> OSDL http://developer.osdl.org/~shemminger _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
