Re: wondershaper query

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 15:00 -0400, Payal Rathod wrote:
> Hello,
> I am trying wondershaper-1.1a on a friend's pppoe connection on her 
> Linux box.
> There are a few things I don't understand.
> 1. She has pppoe connection so should DEV=eth0 or DEV=ppp0 ?

Frankly I can't remember. My home box is not with me right now. Why
don't you give each a shot? My bet is it's ppp0. (90% sure)

> 2. Her ISP just says on her payment bill that the speed is 128kbps, but
> doesn't mention any downlink/uplink speed, so in that case what should 
> be,
> DOWNLINK= and UPLINK= ?

You can try some online bandwith tests. I like the ones at
nyc.speakeasy.net

bear in mind that 128 may mean both up and dn speed (symmetrical) You
may have to play with the numbers a bit to get it right.

> 3. She uses the net in her small office and people mostly to browse the 
> net, send emails
> sometimes ftp data out and sometimes ssh to other servers to trouble 
> shoot their
> programs. In such a case is wondershaper helpful? Or is it not required 
> at all?

Of course it is useful. This is definitely useful to make
non-interactive activity such as FTP slower then interactive (SSH)
activities so not to feel the lag. 



-- 
Ow Mun Heng
Gentoo/Linux on DELL D600 1.4Ghz 1.5GB RAM
98% Microsoft(tm) Free!! 
Neuromancer 12:16:40 up 8 days, 18:28, 5 users, load average: 0.42,
0.30, 0.26 


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux