Re: P2P shaping, won't work

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mensaje citado por Edgar <donvodka@xxxxxxxxx>:

> Hello, its me again, I won't stop sending emails to this list, until I solve
> 
> this problem, I've tried several apps to create the right htb rules (even 
> made them my self), but I always get the same results, traffic gets shaped, 
> but I can't use my bandwidth, and this is weird, because I should be able to,
> 
> also I keep seeing download being limited too, and that shouldn't be 
> happening, I don't think I'm the only one with this problem out there, so I 
> will post here once again my configuration, to match p2p traffic and to shape
> 
> it:
> 
> ### ###
> iptables -t mangle -F
> iptables -t mangle -X
> iptables -t mangle -N lay7PRE
> iptables -t mangle -N lay7POST
> iptables -t mangle -N ipp2pPRE
> iptables -t mangle -N ipp2pPOST
> 
> ### PREROUTING RULES ###
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK --restore-mark
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m mark ! --mark 0 -j ACCEPT
> iptables -t mangle -A ipp2pPRE -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j MARK --set-mark 3
> iptables -t mangle -A ipp2pPRE -p udp -m ipp2p --bit -j MARK --set-mark 3
> iptables -t mangle -A ipp2pPRE -p tcp -m mark --mark 3 -j CONNMARK
> --save-mark
> iptables -t mangle -A lay7PRE -m layer7 --l7proto smtp -j MARK --set-mark 1
> iptables -t mangle -A lay7PRE -m layer7 --l7proto ssh -j MARK --set-mark 2
> iptables -t mangle -A lay7PRE -m mark --mark 2 -j CONNMARK --save-mark
> 
> ### POSTROUTING RULES ###
> iptables -t mangle -A ipp2pPOST -o eth1 -m mark --mark 3 -j CLASSIFY 
> --set-class 1:30
> iptables -t mangle -A lay7POST -o eth1 -m mark --mark 1 -j CLASSIFY 
> --set-class 1:20
> iptables -t mangle -A lay7POST -o eth1 -m mark --mark 2 -j CLASSIFY 
> --set-class 1:10
> 
> ### ###
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j lay7PRE
> iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -j lay7POST
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j ipp2pPRE
> iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -j ipp2pPOST
> 
> TC RULES
> tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 1:0 root dsmark indices 8 default_index 0
> tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 2:0 parent 1:0 htb
> tc class add dev eth1 parent 2:0 classid 2:1 htb rate 22000bps ceil 22000bps
> tc class add dev eth1 parent 2:1 classid 2:2 htb rate 3000bps ceil 5000bps 
> prio 0
> tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 3:0 parent 2:2 sfq
> tc class add dev eth1 parent 2:1 classid 2:3 htb rate 5000bps ceil 6000bps 
> prio 1
> tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 4:0 parent 2:3 sfq
> tc class add dev eth1 parent 2:1 classid 2:4 htb rate 8000bps ceil 8000bps 
> prio 2
> tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 5:0 parent 2:4 sfq
> tc class add dev eth1 parent 2:1 classid 2:5 htb rate 10000bps ceil 10000bps
> 
> burst 0 cburst 0 prio 3 quantum 1500
> tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 6:0 parent 2:5 sfq
> tc class add dev eth1 parent 2:1 classid 2:6 htb rate 10000bps ceil 22000bps
> 
> prio 1
> tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle 7:0 parent 2:6 sfq
> tc filter add dev eth1 parent 2:0 protocol all prio 1 tcindex mask 0x7 shift
> 0
> tc filter add dev eth1 parent 2:0 protocol all prio 1 handle 5 tcindex
> classid 
> 2:6
> tc filter add dev eth1 parent 2:0 protocol all prio 1 handle 4 tcindex
> classid 
> 2:4
> tc filter add dev eth1 parent 2:0 protocol all prio 1 handle 3 tcindex
> classid 
> 2:5
> tc filter add dev eth1 parent 2:0 protocol all prio 1 handle 2 tcindex
> classid 
> 2:3
> tc filter add dev eth1 parent 2:0 protocol all prio 1 handle 1 tcindex
> classid 
> 2:2
> tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol all prio 1 u32 match u8 0x5 0xf at
> 
> 0 match u16 0x0 0xffc0 at 2 classid 1:5
> tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol all prio 1 u32 match u8 0x5 0xf at
> 
> 0 match u8 0x10 0x10 at 33 classid 1:4
> tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol all prio 1 u32 match u8 0x5 0xf at
> 
> 0 classid 1:5
> tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol all prio 1 u32 match u32 0x0 0x0
> at 
> 0 classid 1:5
> 
> well, this rules are generated with tcng (tcc actually), and I see traffic 
> going to the p2p rule (being 2:5), but still I'm not able to browse the web!
> 
> nor chat nor anything, someone adviced me to create an interactive class and
> 
> then leave the unmatched traffic go to a default class (and here'll go p2p 
> traffic too), but then I'm running a squid server at home, and thus I don't 
> know what port to specify to do this, anyway, I've tried already with normal
> 
> http traffic, with layer7, I see the traffic going to the iptables chain, but
> 
> yet it'll still won't work, p2p traffic keeps eating all my bandwidth, its 
> ignoring all the priorities I have in my tc rules (being the 2:5 class the 
> one with the lowest priority), I really need to get this working, and I know
> 
> there's some ppl that has lots of more experience that me, and I'm sure you 
> can help me. Thank you
 
can != want != will

You may have a problem with the rate units -  bps != bit -, but i dont know the
type or rate of your internet link.
Post a detailed ascii diagram of your network. Which is the transfer rate of the
internet link?

IPP2P works very well for me.
How did you test your iptables & tc setup? In the real network or in a
controlled environment?
Did you try starting with a very basic tc setup and adding tc qdiscs, classes
and filters one by one and checking the results on every step?

Regards,
Francisco.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Miles de internautas ya utilizan el discador del Portal.
Bajatelo ahora, se instala solo!.

http://www.montevideo.com.uy/discador/setup.exe

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux