Witaj ro0ot, W Twoim liście datowanym 3 lipca 2005 (18:25:32) można przeczytać: r> Is it possible to combine the 2 or 4 ADSL line into 1 line (big pipe)? As I already wrote: Yes, (more or less :) with some limitations. All those "blind" loadbalancing solutions have one BIG drawback - they work for setups with lots and lots of concurent connections [cause single connection has to use single line], and one smaller but annoying - they cannot guarantee that subsequent reqests to the same host will use the same source IP - home banking affected most. r> Regards, r> ro0ot r> Robert Kurjata wrote: >>Witaj Cao, >> >>W Twoim liście datowanym 2 lipca 2005 (17:40:05) można przeczytać: >> >>CVK> I have 2 ADSL ad1 and ad2 , one PC for my firewall and some >>CVK> deamon on it with 3 ethernet : eth0 connect to my LAN ( >> >>This question comes and goes on this list :) >> >>Please read information at: http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/ , especially http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt >>and you can try my script http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/tmp/mpath2.sh to >>load balance 2 (or more - I was using 4) connections with great >>success. No daemon needed :) >> >>There are also other solutions in list archive. >> >>IMHO the routing code has precedence over iptables so it chooses the >>outgoing interface over which the iptables will SNAT in input routing >>process. And thats why you will not see the effect in this setup (thi >>interface has already been chosen). It is possible (and >>reasonable) to SNAT to multiple IPs residing on one interface. >> >>Correct me if I'm wrong, please...:) >> >> >> -- Pozdrowienia, Robert _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
