One more thing to add is that when I "ping 16.119.144.66" from Node1 (16.119.144.66 is the teql0 of Node2), all messages I saw from Node1.eth1 are ARP messages "Who has 16.119.144.66? Tell 16.119.144.33". Thanks, -Ji -----Original Message----- From: lartc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lartc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Li, Ji Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 3:45 PM To: Pan'ko Alexander; lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: jli@xxxxxxx Subject: RE: urgent TEQL problem Thanks for your advice. The routing tables are shown below. Your help is highly appreciated! Topology: Node1.eth0 and Node2.eth0 are directly connected. Node1.eth1 is connected to Gateway.eth0, and Node2.eth1 is connected to Gateway.eth1. The problem is: When I "ping 16.119.144.66" from Node1, all ping request go to Node1.eth0, no packet goes to Node1.eth1. Node 1: - eth0: 16.119.144.21 - eth1: 16.119.144.33 - teql0: 16.119.144.34 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 16.119.144.66 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 teql0 16.119.144.27 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0 16.119.144.32 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 0 0 0 eth1 16.119.144.64 16.119.144.35 255.255.255.224 UG 0 0 0 eth1 0.0.0.0 16.119.144.35 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 Node 2: - eth0: 16.119.144.27 - eth1: 16.119.144.65 - teql0: 16.119.144.66 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 16.119.144.21 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0 16.119.144.34 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 teql0 16.119.144.32 16.119.144.67 255.255.255.224 UG 0 0 0 eth1 16.119.144.64 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 0 0 0 eth1 0.0.0.0 16.119.144.67 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 Gateway: - eth0: 16.119.144.35 - eth1: 16.119.144.67 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 16.119.144.32 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 0 0 0 eth0 16.119.144.64 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 0 0 0 eth1 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo Best regards, -Ji -----Original Message----- From: lartc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lartc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pan'ko Alexander Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 2:51 PM To: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: urgent TEQL problem I advice you to do not discribe your problem, but give your routing rules on both sides. I think here is your problem. -- With best regards, Pan'ko Alexander. pankoAA@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
