I appreciate you answer, Ed. Thank you. I already use some methods of spam contention, such RBLs, filters and SPF checks. But I really wanna know the answer for the question from my first e-mail. Thank you. 4MBIT INPUT router -> gw-iface 2mbit OUTPUT -> MX-server If HTB (new verb) the interface that communicates with MX, say, 2mbit, what will occur to the Input queue of gw-router-iface? Will I still get the link full with 4mbit or will it get lower to 2mbit too, as the inner interface? On 6/16/05, Ed W <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >Yes, last night it was 4Mbps the rate of incoming mails. > >I was wondering if I apply HTB to the following scheme: > > > > > > You might want to investigate other anti-spam techniques... > > For example I find greylisting very effective, and several block lists > have very low positives for my spam load. See the mailing list for your > MTA if you want to know more though. > > If you are clever then I'm sure you can dream up even more clever ways > to segregate spam senders from real email - in your position I would be > blocking IP addresses by now... > > Ed > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
