Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Proposal: > ---------------------------------- > Another idea would be to create a qdisc HTBQ (HTB with quota) > derived from HTB with the following characteristics: > > htb_rate=min(htbq_rate, (alreadysent=>htbq_squota)?((htbq_quota-alreadysent)/remtime):htbq_rate) Why do you want to decrease speed as the quota is approached? Wouldn't a simple per-class quota or a quota-ematch work as well? Regards Patrick _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc