Re: Internal Qdisc

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

TBF provides traffic shaping by the Token Bucket theory, while SFQ makes
sure(actually just hints) swap packets in different sessions so that no
particular session will hang around for a long time.

Leo

R Harper wrote:
> Hell
> I'm new to Qdisc programming and I was wondering, what is the difference
> between using an internal Qdisc (like e.g. TBF does) vs. not using
> internal Qdisc (like e.g. SFQ does)?
> 
> Can someone give me a quick rundown of pro and cons?
> 
> with regards
> R.harper
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Undg? pop-ups med MSN Toolbar -  http://toolbar.msn.dk hent den gratis!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list
> LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
> 
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux