Re: HTB ATM MPU OVERHEAD (without any patching)

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks! Very prescient of you, since my latest test results prove exactly what you said about needing a higher overhead value! :)

----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy Furniss" <andy.furniss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Chris Bennett" <chris@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: HTB ATM MPU OVERHEAD (without any patching)


To be safe you need overhead alot bigger than 24.

_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux