* Nicolas Patik <nicolas.patik@xxxxxxxxx> 16. Nov 04:
No, I'm not talking about natting ... I'm talking about hidding my computers from my ISP.
Tell me, what's the difference. Can you give some technical description for this 'hiding' you are talking about?
.. or .... are you telling me that the problem with my linux box is about bad firewall rules?
No. 'Firewall rules' are a matter of layer 3, MACs and their so called cloning belong to layer 2.
Right now with my linux box doing NAT they can find that I have others computers connected.
Contradicting to Chris they can. But trust me, they won't. Finding hosts behind a NAT router is very difficult and involves the collection of huge amounts of traffic.[1] After all, it will not work for any OSs.
It's no so dificult, at least in some cases.
p0f (passive OS fingerprint) uses a technique (that has some limitations) to detect masqueraded hosts, it have to sniff all the traffic but not collect it.
http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/p0f.shtml
Regards, Francisco. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
