Hi Eicke, But setting up a bridge there'll be another machine routing, so I'll need ip_forward either way, and I won't avoid the problem if it's really ip_forward, I will only move it to another machine. Regards, Eduardo El lun, 15-11-2004 a las 23:37 +0100, Eicke Friedrich escribió: > Hi, > Eduardo Fernández wrote: > > (http://kem.p.lodz.pl/~peter/qnet/). When I activate ip_forward I get > > >20% packet loss and a lot of duplicates. Any ideas? I attach my shaping > well we've done something similar but instead of using a route we used > a bridge (acting as traffic shaper and firewall). So you don't need > ip_forward maybe this is worth a try in your setup? In general a box > like your should easily handle much more traffic that 4+4MBit/s. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
