Re: Re: [LARTC] RE: [LARTC] Load Balance simply doesn´t work...

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > 
> > ip route add default scope global nexthop via $P1 dev 
$IF1 weight 1 \
> >     nexthop via $P2 dev $IF2 weight 1
> > 
> 
> This multipath routing command keep coming up as classic 
> way to perform multipath routing for NAT access, which I 
> considered it as VERY misleading.
> 
> It should only be used if you are NOT using NAT.

You mean that using NAT its impossible to do load balance or 
this is the worng command? If its the wrong command, what´s 
the right one?
Tks A LOT for the response!
Fernando Favero
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux