Re: bridging shaper

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Jon Anderson wrote:

> Ryan Rothert wrote:
> 
> >Any thoughts as to why this doesnt seem to work on a bridge?  It does work 
> >if the box is setup to be a router. 
> >  
> >
> I have tried to do bridged traffic control with 2.6. It just doesn't 
> seem to work. u32 matches won't work, marking packets with 
> iptables/ebtables then trying to catch them with tc's fw match doesn't 
> work. Filters just won't catch anything in 2.6, and all traffic just 
> leaves through the default class. There are reports of people getting 
> this working, but no real details have emerged.
> 
> With 2.4, it works without problems. I have a few machines running 
> bridging firewalls with traffic control using 2.4. Works without issues.
> 
> Any developers want to shed some light on why 2.6 doesn't seem to go? 
> (Config options?)
> 
> jon
> 

Jon,

I dont really need to run 2.6, 2.4 would be fine, what version are you 
using? Did you compile it yourself? Did you have to apply any extra 
patches if you compiled it yourself?  

Thanks,
Ryan

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux