Re: imq or ingress+htb?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If you only need independent trafic classes then ingress is good option, but
there is no way to prioritize trafic.

Imq is quite stable now, if your kernel is 2.4.22 and later you can easily
try compile this imq version as module.
http://pupa.da.ru/imq


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Patrick Petersen" <lartc@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 7:33 PM
Subject:  imq or ingress+htb?


> Todays quick question:
>
> Ive had problems with imq and getting my setup to work as planned. Im
> thinking that a better solution for shaping incoming traffic would be to
> put a little limit in the outer interface of the router box with ingress,
> and the shape traffic on the inner interface with htb. Would that be
> better than using imq?
> -- 
> Patrick Petersen <lartc@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux