syrius.ml@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
syrius.ml@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
without talking about the wireless features, what's the difference
between http://trash.net/~kaber/hfsc and http://wsched.sf.net hfsc ?
what are rt, ls and ul service curves ?
Regarding this question (please CC me on further questions), the
wsched HFSC port is crappy, it seems to be ported mindlessly without
adapting some parameters to linux (I wonder why the guy got his diploma
for this), which will result in sub-optimal behaviour. Besides, my port
is merged in the mainstream kernel and requires no patching, but the
wsched scheduler includes infrastructure (I can not comment on quality
here) for adapting assigned bandwidth to real conditions for wireless
links.
Regards
Patrick
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
