Re: Questions about IMQ's stability

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Sorry, but I have to disagree... We've discussing this issue at linuximq list and it is not obvious that the postrouting hook is the culprit for all the reported problems. I've being using postrouting for long with no side effects, no crashs, no oops. More investigation on it is needed.


What is a known issue is that one should not try to touch localy generated traffic with IMQ. This is known to cause problems, so you better not try it.

Andre



Roy wrote:
IMQ is quite stable when used on ingress only just dont touch postrouting and it will be ok
you can use either old version, either my new one
which does not need to patch kernel and iptables
you can find it at http://pupa.da.ru/imq/
(but it may be incompatible with some conntrack modules)


----- Original Message ----- From: "Andre Correa" <andre.correa@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Jason Tackaberry" <tack@xxxxxx>
Cc: "lartc" <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: Questions about IMQ's stability




Hi Jason, right now I don't think anybody can assure stability on IMQ. My experience is that IMQ works fine in my enviroment that is a 2.4.23 PPPoE concentrator with ~70 users... It is up and running for more then a month without any problems.

What I would suggest you is to make some stability tests in a lab before putting it into production...

What kernel version will you use? It seens that 2.4.23 is the best bet for now.

IMQ has being unmaintained but there is a groups of people trying to get it on its way again. You can reach the brand new group at: http://www.linuximq.net ... There is
not much new things yet, the work is just starting, but you, and everybody else, is more then welcome to join us there and share your results and needs.


tks and good luck

Andre Correa




Jason Tackaberry wrote:


Hi,

There have been a number of threads lately discussing IMQ's

stability


(or lack thereof). I am about to roll out a new router and I

quite


badly need IMQ's functionality. This is a production

environment,


though, and random panics of course aren't acceptable.

My question is are there any circumstances under which IMQ is

_stable_?


The router will have about 6 interfaces, 2 of which will be

to


(separate) upstream ISPs. The router must be able to manage

the


bandwidth fairly between the remaining four interfaces, so I'll

need


IMQ. Perhaps there is another solution?

Thanks,
Jason.


_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/





_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux