Hello, On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Tushar Thakker wrote: > hi all, > i am setting up a load balancing netwrok with failover, > i have applied julian patch, > but whenever i try to traceroute from any client node, it gives me two entries for that destination, but i get different interface for that entries, > so it doesn't forward my requests, > i have done masquerading for client nodes, > > the ip rule/route are as follows, > > ip rule add prio 222 table 222 > ip route add default table 222 proto static \ > nexthop via $GWE1 dev $IFE1 weight 1\ > nexthop via $GWE2 dev $IFE2 weight 1 > > Now after traceroute failure, if i see the routing cache for that ip, it shows following, output route, probably created from -j MASQUERADE?: > 205.158.62.141 via 203.88.135.213 dev eth1 src 203.88.135.212 > cache mtu 1500 advmss 1460 input route: > 205.158.62.141 from 192.168.1.51 via 203.88.135.205 dev eth2 src 192.168.1.242 > cache <src-direct> mtu 1500 advmss 1460 iif eth0 > > please see eth1 and eth2 in both entries, Nothing strange so far, may be they are created from different connections. In fact, there should be more cache entries. > now it does not forward this request, Can you provide more information, in private mail if you prefer so, including: - tcpdump output(s) for all interfaces during the traceroute - topology: are eth1 and eth2 connected to same hub? - ip rules and routes I hope you really have the "routes" patch applied and running. > what can be the reason behind this and please can anyone suggest me the solution, > thanx in advance, > Regards, > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Tushar Thakker > Elitecore Technologies Ltd. Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
