Re: Problems with ICQ etc. on nano-setup

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

| Can one "bind" traffic from one LAN-user to the same DSL, effective in
| lets say 10 minutes from the initial connection?
| Can some magic with conntrack be put to use?

You should do Equal Cost Multipath (iproute) + MARK target instead of
state-based loadbalancing for problematic protocols/sites.

Create table with default route thru multiple gateways with equalize
option. Then direct problematic traffic to this table (using routing
rules and mark matching)

Equal Cost Multipath chooses route based on source and destination IP,
so it bounds client to route, no matter how many connections that client
made.

It works for me.

PS: I assume you have separate network interface in your Linux router
for each DSL, so you can do SNAT on each interface. If you have them
connected to one NIC then it not that simple, but may be resolved with
route realms (but not sure for 100%).

- --
c0g@xxxxx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/3atPPqmVt5WhbA8RAo/HAJ9XJ1Fb+/LLDkEQs5aUh9nS7aN8DgCfbuVu
yfQXVOluF+uY7DC5+JZxM4g=
=A4og
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux