On Thursday 11 December 2003 16:19, Michal Charvat wrote:
> > Mhh. It should be handy if there is a way to determine the parent-child
> > relation ship.....
>
> You are right, handles in this case are a bit confusing (major:minor
> together isn't the best way...). You can determine parent-child
> relationship from these numbers (as said in archive, higher 16bits are
> major number, lower minor).
>
> It would be possible to provide major/minor separately in table and leave
> indexing in major:minor scheme as is now.
> What do you think about this possibility?
That's not what I wanted to say. I wanted to know if you can entry a new
entry that gives all the classes (or qdisc if the parent is a leaf class)
attached to an other class. Like
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.18756.1.1.12.3.65536 = STRING: "10:10 10:11"
Stef
--
stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
