[LARTC] two upstream providers

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [LARTC] two upstream providers
From: Tomas Bonnedahl <tomas@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 14:59:53 +0200
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control list <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>,<mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>,<mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

anyone here configured a network to use two upstream providers? if yes, did you
use ECMP or routing protocols (EGP/IGP)? how did you solve load balancing 
with equal cost and failover?

-tomas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [LARTC] two upstream providers
  - From: Stef Coene

Prev by Date: [LARTC] WonderShaper on spesific ports?
Next by Date: [LARTC] rsvpd
Previous by thread: [LARTC] WonderShaper on spesific ports?
Next by thread: Re: [LARTC] two upstream providers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [LARTC Home Page] [Netfilter] [Netfilter Development] [Network Development] [Bugtraq] [GCC Help] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux