[LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate

["Rajesh Srivastava" <rajesh@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Title: [LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate

Trevor,

 

Thanks for pointing out one of the possible reasons for the difference.

 

However, in this case I have also tried using the local display and got similar results ( though the difference reduces a bit).

 

Thanks,

 

Rajesh

 

 

>Hey pal,

>What about the overhead part to create the display that flows between
>the internet gateway(Machine you are monitoring) and your machine???.

>Trevor

On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 14:35, Rajesh Srivastava wrote:
> I am using HTB+IMQ on an Ethernet bridge and tc for statistics
> reporting.
> 
> I am finding that tc reported rate is about 5-10% less than that
> reported by IPTraf for the same traffic.
> 
> Has anyone observed this before? Which is more accurate?
> 
> Rajesh
--
( >-        LINUX, It's all about CHOICE      -< )
/~\    __        twarren@xxxxxxxxxx       __   /~\
|  \) /  Pre Sales Consultant - Red Hat     \ (/ |
|_|_  \    9820349221(M) | 22881326(O)      / _|_|
       \___________________________________/

---

• Previous message: [LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate
• Next message: [Re: [LARTC] marking in OUTPUT --mangle; locally generated packets and route lookup - broken?]
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]