[LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate
From: "Rajesh Srivastava" <rajesh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 02:05:44 -0700
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control list <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>,<mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>,<mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Balcom Systems & Technologies, Inc.
Reply-to: "Rajesh Srivastava" <rajesh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I am using HTB+IMQ on an Ethernet bridge and tc for statistics reporting.

I am finding that tc reported rate is about 5-10% less than that reported by IPTraf for the same traffic.

Has anyone observed this before? Which is more accurate?

Rajesh

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate
  - From: Trevor Warren

Prev by Date: Re: [LARTC] marking in OUTPUT --mangle; locally generated packetsand route lookup - broken?
Next by Date: Re: [LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate
Previous by thread: [LARTC] slowing down traffic to a certain port
Next by thread: Re: [LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [LARTC Home Page] [Netfilter] [Netfilter Development] [Network Development] [Bugtraq] [GCC Help] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux