Howzit Guys, I got the problem sorted, I used the examples under "Routing for multiple uplinks/providers" to route stuff out the same interface that it comes and in, and voila!, bob's yer uncle! I wonder if that might not be why the stuff mentioned below didn't work in the first place. Well anyway, cheers! On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:36:31AM +0200, Riaan Annandale wrote: > Hi Guys, > > A couple of days ago I sent a mail here regarding routing browsing > packets to a different gateway. Well here's an update which I believe > will shed more light on the problem. > > I am now marking all TCP and udp packets on a test box with a one. > > I then route these packets via a routing table through an ISDN device. > > If I delete this route I instantly get destination net unreachable from > the client side (my linux box) > > When I add it back in, it just sits and eventually times out. > > If I do a tcpdump on the server that I am trying to telnet I can see > that it's getting the packets that I send to establish the connection > and is sending the SYN packets back, but yet my side still just sits. It > almost appears that it doesn't work with MASQ. > > Now before everyone starts nailing me about MASQ as per > "IMPORTANT: We received a report that MASQ and SNAT at least collide > with marking packets." and "Turn off the reverse path filter to make it > work properly." - I have done that and I get the same results. > > It appears that the packets are being dropped somewhere. > > It feels like I am missing something really small and arb. > > Any help would be appreciated ---end quoted text--- -- Regards, Riaan Annandale Linux Systems Engineer (LPIC-1, CCNA) 0861 22 55 86 riaana at mundane dot co dot za --------------------- Angels we have heard on High Tell us to go out and Buy. -- Tom Lehrer
Attachment:
pgp00148.pgp
Description: PGP signature
