On Thursday 15 May 2003 20:13, Griem, Hans T wrote:
> Hello Cef or...,
>
> Thanks for your input. Yes I am trying to figure out where/what/when these
> obscure CBQ options add value (ie., to conclude whether I should eliminate
> cbq from my "toolchest"). So I wonder since cbq uses the physical link per
> your response is it better suited to bandwidth control for (rf)
> applications with fluctuating link rates, etc?
In contrary. The bandwidth option in cbq should match the real physical link
bandwidth. I don't know how this is done on rf networks.
Comared this to htb. Htb uses a token bucket system to control the rate of
the data. This has nothing to do with the physical link. It just send data
at a certain controlled rate.
I'm not a specialist in this. But I don't think I'm telling any lies :)
Stef
--
stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
