Re: [LARTC] dsmark, unkown

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Well,

 : thanx for the help, it was bec. of the tc, i downloaded the source and
 : "make"ed it. But the old one I had supports the HTB, whereas the new
 : binary doesn't support it (but dsmark already), is it a problem when I
 : use both (one called tc & the other tc_new)?

I don't really know whether that's advisable or not.  I do not know of any
problem this can cause, but why not try applying the htb patch [1]?  It's
not so hard, and then you have a single binary to call instead of two
different binaries.

Maybe somebody else can answer your question about potential problems of
using multiple tc binaries.  Frankly, I think it's probably mostly
confusing for the human.

-Martin

 [1]  http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/v3/htb3.6-020525.tgz

-- 
Martin A. Brown --- SecurePipe, Inc. --- mabrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux