Hi, Has anybody noticed that when: ip addr add 192.168.0.1/32 dev eth0 ip route add 192.168.0.2/32 dev eth0
/32? this would be a subnetmask with one host per subnet - so how could the host communicate with a router in it's own subnet? not at all.
it seems to me this doesn't make much sense. maybe i just haven't got the point.
greetings, ulric
-- ulrich schwarz, computing center, university of ulm, germany
