Re: [LARTC] quantum vs. r2q ?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 01 May 2003 09:17, openings wrote:
> Thanks for your answer. stef.
>
> My exmaple is not suitable.
>
> but, On 100Mbit Ethernet Network environment.
>
> Some class's rate can be 1Mbps.
>
> The other class's rate can be 30Mbps
>
> In this situation, when r2q=10, automatic set quantum value = 12500 (1Mbps
> class) automatic set quantum value = 375000(30Mbps class) ==> too big!
>
>                         when r2q=100, automatic set quantum value = 1250
> (1Mbps class)==> too small! automatic set quantum value = 37500 (30Mbps
> class)
>
>                         when r2q =50, automatic set quantum value = 2500
> (1Mbps class) automatic set quantum value = 75000 (30Mbps class)==> too
> big!
>
> Searching of r2q value is too difficult.
>
> In above situation,
> I select r2q = 50, and when I create 30Mbps class, I use quantum=30000
> option. Is this right?
Yes.  But don't worry about a wrong quantum.  It's only used when 2 classes 
are asking for more bandwidth then the rate.

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux