[LARTC] What's wrong with this loadbalancing ?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello

I have 4 nic eth 1,2,3,4 connecting to DSL lines and 1 NIC is eth5
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx to a ISDN 24/7 dailin line.
eth0 192.168.1.0 is the LAN network

I like to balance these

Why is it still dead if I ad a default gw then traffic is running over that
gw.

ip route show output :

192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0  scope link
10.0.1.0/24 dev eth1  scope link
10.0.2.0/24 dev eth2  scope link
10.0.3.0/24 dev eth3  scope link
10.0.4.0/24 dev eth4  scope link
xxx.xxx.xxx.0/25 dev eth5  scope link
127.0.0.0/8 dev lo  scope link
default
 nexthop dev eth1 weight 1
 nexthop dev eth2 weight 1
 nexthop dev eth3 weight 1
 nexthop dev eth4 weight 1
 nexthop dev eth5 weight 4

Kernel version 2.4.20
compiled with julian's patch
Equal cost multipath is on.

iproute2 version ss001007 is running a newer version gives deadlink on
pervasive (whatever it means) !!!


Thanks

Sjaak



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux