Could it be a problem of port mapping? Emule, edonkey and other use free ports and are not specific about which port they use. If they try to use some ports blocked for inward traffic, timeouts are logical. I may be wrong here as I do not know the exact set up. Mohan -----Original Message----- From: lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 4:28 AM To: Stef Coene; lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [LARTC] [LONG] Weird problem with HTB using htb.init On Monday 17 March 2003 17:25, Stef Coene wrote: > Mhh. It can be. If you add a sfq qdisc, each connection will create > a new entry in the hash key. But I don't know what happens if the > hash key is full. If all other connections end up in 1 hash key, it's > possible that you get timeouts. Hmmm, i closed emule and started an upload using all my UP bandwidth & a download using roughly what emule used. They all fall into the same classes that emule traffic did. I get no timeouts this way. If the number of connections is the problem, is there anyway to prevent this ? Thanks _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
