Re: [LARTC] 2.4.20 htb3 oops

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Abraham,

I'm sorry for mixing up the terms. I thought "oops" and "kernel panic"
were the same thing. This is the text that our technician wrote down
from the screen after the first crasch: 

"...unable to handling kernel null pointer dereference at virtual address 00000
Kernel panic: aiee killing interrupt handling - in interrupt handler not syncing."

He also says that the keyboard LEDs were "blinking". We have not
been able to receive any data from the other crasches, since when
the technician arrived the machines were "stone dead" with the
keyboard LEDs blinking. This is all the data that I have at the moment,
because the machines are physically located far from here.

I realize that this might not be enough information to make something useful of.
It is merely an attempt to somewhat document the problem.

Göran
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Abraham van der Merwe" <abz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Göran Runfeldt" <goran@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control list" <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] 2.4.20 htb3 oops

Hi G?ran!

Oopses or kernel panics? Could you please post the oops dumps (with decoded
symbols of course).

> I am having problems with "oopses" since I introduced HTB on my
> company's PC-based routers. It seems that only routers with high 
> network load are affected. The average network load on the two most
> problematic routers are 10Mbps in/out and 2.5Mbps in/out.
> The other machines with less than 1Mbps average traffic seems unaffected.
>  
> We have been getting oopses on these machines 1-3 times per week.
> 
> We have tried to replace the hardware on both machines without any
> improvement. We are using the same combination of hardware and kernel in
> the same physical location without any problems, so we assume that hardware,
> kernel or heat is not the problem here.
> Machines with high network load that does not have any HTB rules loaded
> do not suffer from this problem.
> 
> Hardware info:
>   Router 1 (10Mbps avg in/out):
>     1 x Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 1.80GHz
>     256MB RAM
>     eth0: Intel Corp. 82801BD PRO/100 VE (CNR)
>     eth1: RealTek RTL8139
> 
>   Router 2: (2.5Mbit avg in/out):
>     1 x Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 1.70GHz
>     128MB RAM
>      eth0: RealTek RTL8139
>      eth1: RealTek RTL8139
> 
> Both use Linux kernel 2.4.20 with patches for FreeS/WAN and connection-
> tracking of GRE/PPTP connections. They are both single processor machines.
> They both shape traffic from and to a VLAN interface. The kernel is compiled
> for CPU type "Pentium-III/Celeron" but the machines are running on
> Pentium-IV/Celeron processors, if that matters. Router 1 were using a P3 CPU
> before we replaced the hardware, and we had the same problem back then.
> 
> Unfortunately I have not been able to gather any output from the consoles of
> the crasched machines.
> 
> Here is the script the ruleset script:
> #!/bin/sh
> for DEV in eth0.123 eth1
> do
>         tc qdisc del dev $DEV root
>         tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb
>         # Total
>         tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 12Mbit
>         # Default class
>         tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 11Mbit
>         # Filesharing traffic
>         tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:3 htb rate 512Kbit
>         # ICMP (Highest priority - on customer's request, not ours)
>         tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:4 htb rate 512Kbit \
> prio 0
>         tc qdisc add dev $DEV parent 1:2 handle 2: sfq
>         tc qdisc add dev $DEV parent 1:3 handle 3: sfq
>         tc qdisc add dev $DEV parent 1:4 handle 4: sfq
>         for PORT in 411 412 413 4661 4662 8081 19114 6340 6341 6342 \
> 6343 6344 6345 6346 6347 6348 6349 1214 1215 6699 6257 7668
>         do
>                 # Send to "crap-class"
>                 tc filter add dev $DEV protocol ip parent 1: prio 1 u32 \
> match ip sport $PORT 0xffff flowid 1:3
>                 tc filter add dev $DEV protocol ip parent 1: prio 1 u32 \
> match ip dport $PORT 0xffff flowid 1:3
>         done
>         tc filter add dev $DEV protocol ip parent 1: prio 1 u32 match ip \
> protocol 1 0xff flowid 1:4 # ICMP
>         tc filter add dev $DEV protocol ip parent 1: prio 2 u32 match ip \
> protocol 0 0x00 flowid 1:2 # Everything else
> done
> 
> I have not tried to apply the HTB patches from the latest prepatch
> version of the Linux kernel or the "htb_3.7_delay_bug" patch
> (I think they do the same thing?). Maybe I should try that?
> 
> I can get more information (like kernel config etc.) if anyone needs it,
> but this thing is really hard to debug since it only happens sporadically.
> 
> Thanks,
> Göran
> 
> >
> > In my SMP system (2xp3) I had also oops (2.4.19 and 2.4.20), but
> > on single processor systems everything is OK.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

-- 

Regards
 Abraham

Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
  -- Elbert Hubbard

___________________________________________________
 Abraham vd Merwe [ZR1BBQ] - Frogfoot Networks
 P.O. Box 3472, Matieland, Stellenbosch, 7602
 Cell: +27 82 565 4451 Http: http://www.frogfoot.net/
 Email: abz@xxxxxxxxxxxx


[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux