Hi All,
Thanks for the help. Stef, our product is already out in the market with 2.4.18 kernel. So if we change the kernel, we will have to go through a full QA cycle which is something we don't want to do :). BTW, I would like to have global limits on the Bandwidth per user irrespective of which interface the traffic might go.Can i do this without using IMQ? Also i want to do my own classification by setting the skb->priority field with the appropriate class ID. Is it possible to use this kind of classification with IMQ and HTB?
i really appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Hemanth
Stef Coene <stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Monday 24 February 2003 20:24, hanumantha kavuluru wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am fairly new to Linux and TC. I am currently implementing Bandwidth
> Management/Traffic Control for a gateway product which is based on Linux
> 2.4.18 kernel. I am required to implement some kind of a user based traffic
> control where each user(source IP) is allocated a fixed amount of
> bandwidth. I also need to do traffic shaping both for the eggress and
> ingress traffic. Going through LARTC documentation , I found that IMQ with
> HTB will suit my requirement. Is anybody using IMQ with HTB? Can HTB and
> IMQ work with 2.4.18 kernel? If so, where can i download all the patches?
> It is difficult for us to migrate to 2.4.20 kernel as most of the software
> has already been developed using 2.4.18 kernel.
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~patrick/imq/
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/
And you don't need imq. If you have a gateway, you can shape on both
interface so you can control up- and download traffic.
Just wondering, what kind of software do you developped so you can not use
kernel 2.4.20 ??
Stef
--
stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, and more
