RE: [LARTC] Some help please !

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



As timer is acurate. And also remember I measure whole frames
with ethernet header. Depends what measures your meter.
For long lived traffic (several seconds) you can expect
about 1packet variation - it is 1% from rate for 100 packets.
devik

On Fri, 24 May 2002, Justin Owens wrote:

> Right...yeah...578 and 868 and I'm looking for 600 and 900 :-)
> How accurate would you normally expect HTB to be ??
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Devera [mailto:devik@xxxxxx]
> Sent: 24 May 2002 18:47
> To: Justin Owens
> Cc: lartc
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] Some help please !
>
>
> Ehh and another hint, what is kbps in your mind ? BYTES or BITS ?
>
> On Fri, 24 May 2002, Justin Owens wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am testing HTB using Iperf to generate traffic on a couple of ports and
> > trying to shape the traffic. I am using the script following but my
> results
> > don't seem to make sense.
> > I am seeing 4627Kbps on port 100 and 6944 on port 150.
> > I'm sure there's a reasonable explaination for this but I can't find it !
> >
> > Any help would be appreciated.
> >
> > Rgds.
> > Justin
> >
> >
> > tc qdisc del dev eth1 root
> >
> > tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 12
> >
> > tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 600kbps ceil 600kbps
> > tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 900kbps ceil 900kbps
> >
> > tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dport
> 100
> > 0xffff flowid 1:1
> > tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dport
> 150
> > 0xffff flowid 1:2
> >
> >
> >
> > The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential,
> intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
> addressed. If the reader of this email is not the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error,
> please notify the sender immediately by email and delete this email. Any
> views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender unless the
> sender specifically states
> > This mail was virus scanned by SurfControl.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
> >
> >
>
>
> The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential, intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this email is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete this email. Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender unless the sender specifically states
> This mail was virus scanned by SurfControl.
>
>
>
>



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux