Hello, On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Stephen wrote: > Thanks for that. I have it working now. > > Here is my much neater route table. My rules look scarey but I think thats > ok. Sorry Im still using a few tables :) > > ip ro add 0.0.0.0/0 dev ppp0 proto static table main > ip ro add 0.0.0.0/0 dev eth0 proto static table eth0 > ip ro add 0.0.0.0/0 via 202.2.2.17 dev eth1 proto static table eth1 > ip ro add 0.0.0.0/0 via 202.3.3.129 dev eth2 proto static table eth2 > ip ro add from 202.1.1.128/25 via 202.3.3.129 proto static table eth2 I still don't understand your setup ... > My question is tho, I have your route patch in my kernel, but if I do a > ifconfig eth1 down and then ifconfig eth1 up, stuff that was headed out > eth1 before the down/up now goes out the default route ppp0 until I re-add > the eth1 route. I believe that with your patch the routes should stay? I can confirm a problem with static routes that remain in dead state but I don't understand your question. Is this the same problem you are talking about? > Thanks again Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
