Mike Fedyk wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 01:51:15PM -0500, Nikolai Vladychevski wrote: > > Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > A while ago I saw a message saying that the TC features in 2.2 aren't > > > very mature, and I'm wondering what I'd be missing out on if I stayed > > > with 2.2 instead of using 2.4 now. > > > > download 2.4.6 > > download 2.2.lastest > > > > make a diff on net/sched directory and see the difference. You would > > miss like 2000 lines of bugfixes if you stay with 2.2, but anyway 2.4.6 > > is not yet stable with "tc features", so if it works for you dont move > > it until 2.4.15 or so ... > > Are you saying that the QoS traffic control features have stability > problems, or is this just general 2.4 instability? what I have listened and what my friends say general 2.4 is not very stable. What I have seen myself is that 2.4 works ok for me, but since the change logs for 2.4.x are full of "network update" stuff, i still not very sure it is stable. About QoS traffic .... I just had posted about some problems in CBQ code, even if I had incorretly set it up, it shouldn't freeze kernel, so , as long as you understand it well and use the tc command correctly, it will work for you. But what I am trying to do is to release it for production where the end users would point & click for filter creation & bandwidth definition, so I think it will be an adventure, but I am accepting the risks... after all.... it's free code.... Regards Nikolai
