[LARTC] 150.150. addresses

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [LARTC] 150.150. addresses
From: "adelphia" <xerid@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 22:24:18 -0400
Delivered-to: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
List-archive: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control list <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20010620100104.112DF75052@outpost.ds9a.nl>
Sender: lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Are 150.150.*.* adresses private or reserve addresses?
My friend has a one, and I tried doing an nslookup, ping, and traceroute
with no luck.

Thanks

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [LARTC] 150.150. addresses
  - From: Fredrik Björk
- Re: [LARTC] 150.150. addresses
  - From: Tomasz Orzechowski

Prev by Date: [LARTC] [diffserv] At present , TC architecture made for Diffserv on linux is wrong
Next by Date: Re: [LARTC] 150.150. addresses
Previous by thread: [LARTC] [diffserv] At present , TC architecture made for Diffserv on linux is wrong
Next by thread: Re: [LARTC] 150.150. addresses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [LARTC Home Page] [Netfilter] [Netfilter Development] [Network Development] [Bugtraq] [GCC Help] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux