Re: [LARTC] Marking packets for shaping

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I had ever met this condition
I change chain rule at iptables,try like this

iptables -I OUTPUT -t mangle -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 192.168.62.0/24 -j MARK
--set-mark 1

and it works.

Regards

Johan

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 11:07:07AM -0400, Ramin Alidousti wrote:
> I assume that the packets come in on eth0, right? And I'm not sure
> if the mangle table sees the destination as 192.168.62.0/24 or as
> the original destination address. Try this:
> 
> iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -p tcp -i eth0 -d 192.168.62.0/24 \
> 	-j MARK --set-mark 1
> 
> If it doesn't work, try:
> 
> iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -p tcp -i eth0 -d <orig dst IP's>
> 	-j MARK --set-mark 1
> 
> Hope it works,
> Ramin
> 
> On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 04:52:30PM +0200, Jaco van der Schyff wrote:
> 
> > I removed the comments from the file below, also this isnt the 
> > complete file, but it should be enough to give you an idea what
> > I want to acheive.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 192.168.62.0/24 -j
> > MARK \
> >  --set-mark 1
> > 
> > tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 10: cbq bandwidth 64Kbit avpkt 1000
> > 
> > tc class add dev eth1 parent 10:0 classid 10:1 cbq bandwidth 64Kbit rate
> > \
> >    64Kbit allot 1514 weight 6Kbit prio 8 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000
> > 
> > tc class add dev eth1 parent 10:1 classid 10:100 cbq bandwidth 64Kbit
> > rate \
> >  32Kbit allot 1514 weight 3Kbit prio 5 maxburst 20 avpkt 100 bounded
> > 
> > tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:100 sfq quantum 1514b perturb 15
> > 
> > tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 10:1 prio 100 handle 1 fw
> > classid 1:100
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Regards
> >  - Jaco van der Schyff
> >    jvds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> >    +27 12 803 7591
> >    +27 12 803 7285 (f)
> >    +27 83 680 4922 (mobile)
> > 
> >    f6e2eb48937f22e159a408c84533cdcb
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Ramin Alidousti wrote:
> > > 
> > > what is/are your setup/rules? It should work just fine.
> > > 
> > > Ramin
> > > 
> > > On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 04:32:00PM +0200, Jaco van der Schyff wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Greetings earthlings,
> > > >
> > > > I am batteling to get NATted packets marked with iptables,
> > > > to shape them later using the fw filter.
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone tried to mark packets that are masqueraded, or
> > > > to shape masqueraded connections?
> > > >
> > > > It doesn't seem to work.
> > > >
> > > > If any knows what to do, please help.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/

-- 
             -'-      
             (o o)     
---------ooO--(_)--Ooo-------------------------------------------------
  (  )/  \( )( ) (  ) ( \( )      Visit us at http://www.pinguind.co.id
 __)(( () ))__(  /__\  )  (   Feel free to contact me at ICQ  #47240718       
(___/ \__/(_)(_)(_)(_)(_)\_)                 email:johan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx          
-----------------------------------------------------------------------



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux