[LARTC] Is this a mistake (AF level)?????

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I saw the draft-almesberger-wajhak-diffserv-linux-00.txt file.
But in this file say that AF21 is 0x18 and AF22 is 0x1a.
 
If the rfc2597 is right(list below)
  The RECOMMENDED values of the AF codepoints are as follows: AF11 = '
   001010', AF12 = '001100', AF13 = '001110', AF21 = '010010', AF22 = '
   010100', AF23 = '010110', AF31 = '011010', AF32 = '011100', AF33 = '
   011110', AF41 = '100010', AF42 = '100100', and AF43 = '100110'. 
 
AF21 and AF22 is 010010 and 010100
010010 = 0x12
010100 = 0x14
is that right??????
Why many papers and documents arent' use this table?????

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux