bert hubert wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:11:58AM -0500, David A. Bandel wrote: > > Ooops. Forgot to check the addresses and send back to the list :-( > > > > > > Guy Van Den Bergh wrote: > > > > > > Have you tried to set a default route to the IP address of the tunnel > > > interface at the main network: > > > ip route add default via a.b.c.d > > > where a.b.c.d is the IP address you gave to the tunnel interface at the > > > main network end. > > > > RTNETLINK answers: Network is unreachable > > > > This is the same answer when I try to set the default route via the > > tunnel name. > > Has this problem been solved yet? Unfortunately, no. Fortunately, only a very few sites are affected by the disparate route problem (and the RFCs provide that packets may not return by the same route). I'm just waiting for a frame relay line and I'll close the tunnel, but I was hoping for a solution to this in the meantime. Ciao, David A. Bandel -- Focus on the dream, not the competition. -- Nemesis Racing Team motto
