Re: [LARTC] CBQ and WRR

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

> > The WRR qdisc mentioned in the howto has never been a part of the standard kernel.
> 
> Linux CBQ actually _does_ implement a WRR variant known as DRR (Deficit
> Round Robin). DRR is better than classical WRR. Read the Varghese paper
> to see the difference.

Yes, but in the howto also a qdisc named WRR is mentioned.

A quick search on Google BTW said that DRR is only better in terms of speed of the implementation but is worse in terms distribution bandwidth.


Christian




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux