Re: [LARTC] pointopoint flag

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [LARTC] pointopoint flag
From: Guy Van Den Bergh <guy.vandenbergh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 20:07:48 +0200
Cc: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
List-archive: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control list <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <3ABA8229.B40D2A7B@rcmt.com> <3ABA7A90.6020803@pandora.be> <20010324224732.G9548@home.ds9a.nl>
Sender: lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i586; en-US; 0.8) Gecko/20010217

bert hubert wrote:


You CAN use Ethernet in a point-to-point configuration, by the way. Saves
some IP adresses.

How do you that? PPPoE (PPP over Ethernet)? This is more like ppp emulation over ethernet. And thus this introduces protocol overhead.

What do you mean by this? I'm puzzled.

Guy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [LARTC] pointopoint flag
  - From: bert hubert

References:
- [LARTC] pointopoint flag
  - From: mike stjohn
- Re: [LARTC] pointopoint flag
  - From: Guy Van Den Bergh
- Re: [LARTC] pointopoint flag
  - From: bert hubert

Prev by Date: Re: Request for TEXT: [LARTC] "onlink" option for ip route
Next by Date: Re: [LARTC] pointopoint flag
Previous by thread: Re: [LARTC] pointopoint flag
Next by thread: Re: [LARTC] pointopoint flag
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [LARTC Home Page] [Netfilter] [Netfilter Development] [Network Development] [Bugtraq] [GCC Help] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Fedora Users]