Re: [LARTC] iproute2 and routing entries

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 06:35:48PM +0100, Michael Schoen wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> i am just playing around with iproute2 and some questions came to my mind.
> 
> I´m wondering why I get a route entry for the subnet of eth0s primary addr 
> if I use the command "ip link set eth0 up". 
> 
> I´m personally not a friend of such behaviour, because I often need some
> strange routing set-ups. Is it possible to avoid this behaviour, meaning I
> only get routing entries if I really set them by myself?

This behaviour has been hotly contested on the linux kernel mailinglist,
perhaps the archives can tell you if there is a way around this.

Also read the 'ifconfig replacement script' bij Alexey which contains Deeper
Magic which might be useful.

Regards,

bert hubert

-- 
PowerDNS                     Versatile DNS Services  
Trilab                       The Technology People   
'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux