On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, bert hubert wrote: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 01:24:09PM -0300, Aldrin Martoq A. wrote: > > > So, It doesn't make sense to mark packet (C) because it will never go to > > the local network and I cannot control that bandwidth, because I just > > receive it. And also It doesn't make sense to mark packet (D) because > > SQUID will eat all the bandwidth with packets (B) and (C) anyway. > > Because squids repackets your data, any shaping information is lost. Once > your data has left squid, there is no way to know anymore where it came > from. > You can try to get the ingress policer working, which tries to do shaping on > the receiving interface (before squid). This should work, except that people > have been having trouble with the ingress policer. Or, alternately, you might try to configure one squid per bandwith-partition, thereby getting back your shaping information. This does come at a cost, but it is actually relatively easy to set up. You might need NAT to do it though... ;) Doei, Arthur. (Yaay, coding shaping information into IP addresses... ;)) -- /\ / | Fight Scientology, See URL: http://xenu.xtdnet.nl/ | /__\ / | Buttons. Lotsa buttons. I like buttons. [Big Dog] | / \/__ | A friend is someone with whom you can dare to Be yourself. | Just Be +-Arthur van Leeuwen, arthurvl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx+
