Re: what NIC for heavy load?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 22:30:10 +0100
Anton Tinchev <atl@unixsol.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> first i wonna thank you for the great work.
> I have few slack boxes with several 3com cards that acts as routers.
> Some of them has 50+ vlans, 100 000+ routing entries, full BGP (zebra) with 10+ peers
> and routes 50-70 mb/s traffic. Everithing is rock solid, few months uptimes.

Sounds pretty impressive, really. I admire such setups.

> I wona to upgrade some of my cards and need advice what to use.
> On 100+mb/s interrups killing my boxes - 20 000+/s (yes, coalescing, i know:))
> What to use? tigon2 or tigon3 for gigabit? (3c985 or 3c996)

None of them! Or at least not tigon3! I've tried to use one (3c996-T), and I experienced
strange system lockups. The board is a dual Tyan Tiger MP with couple of Athlon MP 1600+. It was
just hanging from time to time with completely no output of any kind. Just rock solid lockup. :/

Anyway, I changed to a good old 3c905C and now I don't have any problems. Well, I'm serving at
half of your rate, but anyway. So, I would suggest using HP equipment. At least I've heard that
it works quote well.


-- 
_____________________________________________________________

With kind regards,
Nickola

Attachment: pgp00064.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux