Stef Coene wrote: >And one of the mose convincing arguments to me : htb is actively maintained. >If there is a bug or performance problem, it will get fixed. > > And, being newer code that many of us have looked at, patches / fixes will probably flow to the maintainer faster than CBQ ones. BTW, how many people are using the patched SFQ (ESFQ?) these days, and how stable is it? -- Michael T. Babcock C.T.O., FibreSpeed Ltd. http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
