Is there a way to set fwmark without iptables ?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Is there a way to set fwmark without iptables ?
From: Jacob Teplitsky <jacobt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 07:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control list <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>,<mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>,<mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I'm looking for something like this:
ping --fwmark 1234 ...

bind (fwmark, .....)


Thanks
- Jacob
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Prev by Date: [tctree] now seems to work ok :")
Next by Date: tctree + tcng
Previous by thread: [tctree] now seems to work ok :")
Next by thread: tctree + tcng
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [LARTC Home Page] [Netfilter] [Netfilter Development] [Network Development] [Bugtraq] [GCC Help] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux