Vladimír Trebický <druid@mail.cz> wrote: |The problem with PSCHED_CPU is that the time is derived by reading of TSC |registry which is measure counter of the processor. TSC exists on Intel |platform from the times of Pentium but sometimes cannot be used as a |counter, for example with APM (advanced power management) turned on. ]- that's good then 'cause I didn't compiled power-management into the kernel :") Do u know any other reason not to use PSCHED_CPU ? In the past I have setup "HZ = 1000" when building QoS is it wise to do it if the only purpose of this computer is QoS+Firewall and of course it is powerfull enought 1.8GHz. And I don't expect it to exceed 1000 slow-qos-channels and handle not more than 1Mb/s most of the time. raptor PS.Sorry for the ignorance what is TSC-regitry and its use ? thanx.. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
