Arindam Haldar wrote: > hi Alex, > thanx so much.. :) .. thanx to all > my IMQ & htb3 test rules are working ok.. the best part--> imq handling > both in & out traffic now.. :) I also had this setup, and i also thought of it as a "cool thing" :) but then Patrick told me, that it's not so clever: the incoming traffic must pass 2 qdiscs (interface-qdisc and imq-qdisc) and this is bad/not good because 1) cpu - overhead (but this could be negleted) AND 2) these 2 qdiscs COULD drop packets and no one would know of the other having dropped s.th. -> retransmit ok. case 2 is not so realistic, as the qdisc on the interface normaly is the qfifo but nevertheless point 1) and the possibility of 2) made me think that queing double unnecessary. > > Alexey Talikov wrote: > >> Hello Arindam, >> See imq faq http://luxik.cdi.cz/~patrick/imq/faq.html >> Saturday, August 10, 2002, 9:46:00 AM, you wrote: >> > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
